Is artificial intelligence possible? Essay -- Computer Science

Is slushy intelligence possible?IS A.I. POSSIBLE?In the science fiction film, The Terminator order by James Cameron,the electronic data processors in the movie get smart and rise up against their humanmasters. In other words, the data processors in the movie were able to proceed independent of their programmers and developed a kind ofartificial intelligence (A.I.). This essay will prove that in reallife, computers will never realize artificial intelligence, and tooeven though functionalism is based on an analogy between humans andcomputers, it is an effective way to describe the interaction betweenthe mind and body. twain essays will be evaluated in this essay. Thefirst essay was called Can Computers Think? by John Searle whichrejects the theory of A.I. The second essay was called Escaping fromthe Chinese Room by Margret Boden, which supports A.I.A functionalist view of the mind is one that draws an analogy betweenthe functioning of the human encephalon and the functioning of the digitalcomputer. The strongest view says that the mind and the brain atomic number 18 justdigital computers. This is called strong A.I., which is a term coinedby John Searle.American Hilary Putnam was one of the first to make the analogybetween the brain and the computer Putnam said it made no more senseto compare the mind and the brain then to compare the software withthe hardware of a computer. He also made the point that psychologistswere like programmers and electrical engineers were like physicians.Putnam also made the point not to take the analogy too far. There are of the essence(predicate) differences between computers and humans. One of thedifferences Putnam felt was that all humans were able to learn fromtheir experience and so change their own program but few computerscould do that unaided Hilary Putnam also argued against identifyingpsychological events with neurophysiologic events, and even againstthe attempt to do so. He felt mapping the brain to the mind was awa ste of time.Jerry Fodor was another soundly known functionalist. Fodor, like Putnamfelt that functionalism alleviated many of the problems associatedwith other mind body theories. These other mind body theories includedCartesian Dualism, materialism, behaviorism and the personal identity theory.Cartesian Dualism is the theory that that the mind and the brain aretwo separate things... ... as these are products of peoplenot brains. She tries to demonstrate that the robot and the humanbrain are the same, in that they are both made up of small very stupidparts which build into a collective brain that is satisfactory ofunderstandingThe fact that a certain light sensitive cell can respond to intensitygradients and that one neuron can inhibit the bagging of anotherProblem with this explanation is that now instead of input from akeyboard, the robot now receives its information from its sensors. Theinput will still be bear upon programming in the CPU of the robot.Boden did not disprove Searles point that the syntax of a program isnot sufficient for understanding of a digital computer system. Bodencould not show that non-biological entity did have understanding, butshe did show that Searles argument on this point was a little weakbecause it relied on in tuition. The functionalism theory was shown tobe an attractive theory a long as it was not taken too literally.Consequently it was shown in this essay that due to syntactical natureof computer programs and the computers lack of causal powers neededfor a machine to have mental states.